In proceedings, a blockchain analysis is only as strong as its method. Courts and prosecutors need to know which data was used, at which block, with which labels, and where the analysis stops being fact and becomes inference.
We write reports that state all of this, with annexes that let anyone repeat the work. We prepare the technical part of criminal complaints, act as party-appointed technical consultant, and review analyses produced by others.
With counsel we define the questions the report must answer and the procedural deadlines.
We collect and fix the on-chain data at a given block, so the analysis can be reproduced.
We draft the report and its annexes, separating established facts from inferences.
We answer questions from the authorities and the parties and update the report when needed.
Yes, when it is reproducible. Our reports state the data source, the block at which data was taken, the method and the limits, and include the transaction ledger, so that the authority or a court-appointed expert can verify each step.
Our reports are used in proceedings in many jurisdictions. We work directly in Switzerland and Italy and, elsewhere, alongside local counsel. We write in English, Italian, German and French.
Yes. We check whether each conclusion is supported by the data, identify untraced branches or wrong attributions, and put our findings in a written review.
We rely on BlockchainAnalysis.io as our provider for the analysis of on-chain and off-chain data. BlockchainAnalysis.io →